Meme Coin $ROSS Sparks Controversy After Major Loss by Ross Ulbricht

The space of cryptocurrency is no stranger to speculation with a high risk, but the recent launch of $ROSS—a meme coin with a total supply of 1 billion tokens—has set off a controversy.

The token—named after the not-so-illustrious founder of “Silk Road,” Ross Ulbricht—was allocated in a truly unique (but iffy) way: 50% of the supply went directly to Ulbricht’s wallet. Some saw this as a lovely tribute to Ulbricht (who might otherwise have received no support while in prison) and as an instance of financial help for him. Others raised a lot of ethical concerns. Should the “meme coin” even be used in such a way?

The provided text appears to be a description of a cryptocurrency traded on the BingX exchange. It states that $ROSS is a volatile asset with a market cap exceeding $13 million. The token is said to have turned an unexpected corner since its launch. That’s a lot of hedge-fund-like talk for a cryptocurrency with a cap of just over $13 million that trades on an exchange in direct opposition to what Ulbricht has been fighting for since his incarceration.

In a stunning turn of events, Ross Ulbricht, or at least the wallet connected to him (@RealRossU), lost 400 million $ROSS tokens—worth around $1.77 million—because of a blunder when trying to add liquidity to the Raydium pool. In decentralized finance (DeFi), users often add their own tokens to a trading pool to keep the trades flowing—ideally, because those users earn a kind of interest on the tokens they’ve fed into the pool. But in this case, of course, Ulbricht’s wallet went the other direction. $ROSS is a fungible token, which means anything you can do with a dollar, you can also do with a $ROSS. And it’s a DeFi world, so keep that in mind.

Traders and bots looking for arbitrage on the blockchain did not miss this error. One particular maximal extractable value (MEV) bot was able to spot the unusual transaction and take advantage of the situation. The outcome was a highly profitable operation for the MEV bot.

MEV bots aim to exploit the decentralized exchange’s inefficiencies by doing front-running or sandwiching operations to extract profits. Here, an MEV bot has executed a very profitable trade, spending just 2.3 SOL (which was worth $556 at the time) to buy 398.6 million $ROSS tokens at an almost ridiculously low price.

In mere moments, the bot unloaded the acquired tokens for a jaw-dropping 2,669 SOL, roughly $643,500. This lightning-fast execution allowed the bot to walk away with a net profit of almost $643,000—an extraordinary gain compared to its initial investment. The occurrence displayed both the efficiency and the potential risks of automated trading in DeFi, where a single misstep can be ruthlessly exploited by sophisticated algorithms.

The debate over the ethical aspects of $ROSS’s tokenomics and its wider effects on the crypto market has now turned into a saga. Critics had already condemned the decision to allocate 50% of the total supply to Ulbricht’s wallet. They said it was bad for business and worse for the crypto ethic because it blurred the lines between what’s really edgy (like supporting someone who’s done hard time for nonviolent crimes) and what’s kinda creepy (trading on a 7:1 potential returns ticket).

Moreover, the MEV bot exploit highlighted the fundamental dangers of decentralized trading. Although blockchain technology affords a front-row seat to all traders, allowing them to peruse the order book, it also lets highly skilled traders and automated systems smoke out and capitalize on the order book’s most vulnerable moments—frequently to the detriment of less sharp, less automated, and less experienced traders.

Even though these issues have been raised, the steady volatility of $ROSS is very attractive to those who like to speculate. With a current market cap of just $13 million, and trading activity that floats up and down like a medieval stock market wave of the hand, the token incarnates the unpredictability of meme coins. If you want to make or lose a fortune in an instant, trading $ROSS is one way to accomplish that dubious end.

The ascent and turbulence of $ROSS remind us that meme coins within the cryptocurrency ecosystem are still evolving. They aren’t financial assets in the traditional sense; they live and die by hype, speculation, and community sentiment. But $ROSS introduces something new. It’s not only a standard-issue meme coin; it’s also a meme coin with a purpose, and the purpose is not only to honor an iconic memer but also, through that iconic figure, to critique the financial system as a whole.

This incident is another complex chapter in Ross Ulbricht’s story. It has not been determined whether the $ROSS token will continue to hold value, attract new investors, or will face regulatory scrutiny. Meanwhile, traders in the $ROSS market must remain vigilant because meme coins have a reputation for being as unpredictable as they are profitable.

The cryptocurrency industry keeps evolving. In this enticing arena, a story can hardly be more thrilling than that of ROSS. Whether told as a cautionary tale or as an example of the high-stakes nature of digital asset speculation, ROSS makes for riveting reading. He was a right-move-just-in-time, high-profit, and then, oh wait, not him, after all, “devastating losses.”

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!

Image Source: pitinan/123RF // Image Effects by Colorcinch

The post Meme Coin $ROSS Sparks Controversy After Major Loss by Ross Ulbricht appeared first on The Merkle News.