The Business & Technology Network
Helping Business Interpret and Use Technology
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 

Kraken vs. SEC: Ripple’s Legal Chief Drops Bombshell on Regulatory Tactics!

Ripple CEO

The post Kraken vs. SEC: Ripple’s Legal Chief Drops Bombshell on Regulatory Tactics! appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has voiced strong support for Kraken in its legal battle against the U.S. SEC. With a bold defense, Alderoty has spotlighted a key takeaway from the court’s recent decision: the notion of a “crypto asset security” is not recognized. This, according to Alderoty, is a significant blow to the SEC’s enforcement strategy, which relies heavily on legal disputes to regulate the crypto space.

Though experts and crypto cheered the judgment, SEC overreach continues. Let’s dig in.

Court Ruling Sparks Debate

The legal tension escalated when U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit, requiring the exchange to respond within 20 days. Despite this setback, Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer, Marco Santori, found a silver lining in the court’s ruling. 

He emphasized that the court acknowledged the ambiguity in the SEC’s argument that Kraken’s tokens are securities, labeling the regulator’s stance as “unclear at best and confusing at worst.”

The Core Issue: What Defines Security?

Santori further dissected the court’s decision, drawing parallels with Ripple’s legal challenges. He noted that the court, much like in Ripple’s case, distinguished between a crypto token and the agreements surrounding it. This distinction implies that the SEC’s broad claim that all tokens are securities is flawed. For the SEC to proceed, it would need to prove that every individual transaction on Kraken qualifies as a security—a monumental task that Santori believes the regulator cannot accomplish.

Bill Morgan highlights that the SEC vs Kraken decision supports Judge Torres’ earlier ruling in the SEC vs Ripple case, affirming that the token itself is not considered a security.

The SEC’s Overreach Under Fire

Moreover, Santori also criticized the SEC’s approach to regulating the crypto industry through enforcement actions. He warned that applying this method across the entire industry could lead to prolonged, costly litigation, with billions of transactions needing to be scrutinized. Such an approach, he argued, is neither practical nor sustainable. Kraken, bolstered by support from figures like Alderoty, is gearing up for a fight, confident in its ability to prevail.

The Broader Impact on the Crypto Industry

As Kraken and other crypto exchanges like Coinbase continue to face pressure from the SEC, the industry is responding by ramping up compliance efforts. This ongoing legal pressure has led other crypto companies, like Binance, to strengthen their compliance efforts in response to SEC scrutiny.

Let’s discuss: Is the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies the right one? 

Also Discover How the laws & regulations affecting blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, can impact its adoption.